There're two actions we need to take: 1. Figure out the root cause for the following test failure:
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase. client.TestHCM Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 406.707 sec <<< FAILURE! Results : Tests in error: testManyNewConnectionsDoesnotOOME(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestHCM) testRegionCaching(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestHCM) 2. Backport HBASE-3777 to 0.90 Actually these two actions are related. I can imagine the disappointment among hbase users if HBASE-3777 weren't included in 0.90.3 My two cents. On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote: > It's a pretty big change and it would need to be backported, but I > understand your concern. > > In my ideal world, 0.92.0 would be released in not too long and this > would be a non-issue. > > In the real world, for all I know, 0.92.0 could be released in 6 > months or more and people would be struggling with ZK connection > errors during all that time (and we would tell them to patch their > 0.90 themselves). > > Here's what I propose: > > - Release 0.90.3 without HBASE-3777 since it already has enough going > and it's almost ready to go out. > - Backport HBASE-3777 and post the patch in that jira, considering > that the 0.90 branch won't be changing a lot in the foreseeable future > so it should apply cleanly for some time. > - Point people to that patch and ask them to try it out on 0.90, I > know for sure that we'll we doing it here. > - In the mean time, the patch will get more usage in trunk as we > prepare a 0.92 release and might find issues. > - Finally consider patching it in for 0.90.4 if we have enough > confidence in it (with or without some other fixes that we would have > figured out by then). > > Does that sound good to you? > > Thx, > > J-D > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we get HBASE-3777 into 0.90.3 ? > > > > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi devs, > >> > >> I think we should release 0.90.3 pretty soon, it already has 30 fixed > >> bugs including 4 blockers and a good bunch of nice to have > >> fixes/improvements. > >> > >> Since there are no other blockers we could build a RC right now but it > >> seems there's a few more jiras[1] that could be quickly resolved. > >> > >> This is why I'm asking all devs to review the jiras that are still > >> opened against 0.90.3 and to either add a fix or punt. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> > >> J-D > >> > >> > >> 1. > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=fixVersion+%3D+%220.90.3%22+AND+project+%3D+HBASE+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+ORDER+BY+updated+DESC > >> > > >
