Given that Hadoop does not require ZooKeeper, but we do anyway, I wonder if it makes more sense to go our own route and host all of configuration in the ZooKeeper namespace.
--- On Fri, 5/20/11, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Stack <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: dynamic configuration loading > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, May 20, 2011, 1:03 PM > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:15 PM, > Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > > > You should check out HADOOP-7001 - it would be nice if > we followed a > > similar pattern in HBase. > > > Agree. I made hbase-3909. > St.Ack >
