> From: Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> > > > I have patches for HDFS-347 and HDFS-941 (and > > HDFS-918) for CDH3U0. > > Does your 347 patch do security? or just the one where it > sneaks around back? > > Have you tested the others under real load for a couple > days?
We use the sneaky 347 and, sure, it's a complete hack. We put DataNodes _and_ RegionSevers into the TCB. We only use 918, which indeed was tested under load over a period of time. I put 947 into our "next" branch so it is up for evaluation next, among other changes (like snappy integration). I could very well end up pulling it, depending. - Andy
