Hi Nileema, Absolutely no need for apologies. Actually I never realized that you were also working on the same and saw your patch when I was about to commit my patch.
I created a new JIRA (4213) just so that I can bring up an additional option to the table with out polluting or hijacking your efforts from 1730. thanks a lot for your help on this. Subbu On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:03 PM, nileema shingte wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Thank you for starting a thread to bring this to closure. > > I have only read Subbu's description of the approach. I believe the main > difference is that 4213 uses the zookeeper to maintain if all regions have > the updated schema and reopening the regions is the RegionServer's > responsibility, where as 1730 it happens in memory in the Master, and reopens > are issued by the master. > > I have not read through the patch submitted on 4213, so am not sure if it > allows you to configure the number of regions that reopen at a time. Apart > from this I think that 1730 is a subset of 4213 and if 4213 agrees more with > the HBase ideology, we should definitely use that as a patch. > > In either case, I will respond to the comments on the Jira and upload > detailed description for the same. > > Thanks, > Nileema > > PS: I am new to HBase and was working on this during my internship. I wasn't > aware of other efforts towards this. Apologies if I created any > inconvenience. > > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Surely they do. > > If they summarize their plan, it would be easier for others to make a > > decision. > > > > > > I'd tend to think its their decision to make. We are just here to > cheer them on (smile). > > Subbu you going to come to the hackathon > (http://www.meetup.com/hackathon/) or meetup on Monday > (http://www.meetup.com/hbaseusergroup/events/28518471/)? You Nileema? > > Good stuff, > St.Ack >
