We thought about it earlier, but single machine needing to come back up to restore didnt seem like a good idea.
-ryan On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Mathias Herberts <mathias.herbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 4, 2011 1:39 AM, "Bill de hÓra" <li...@dehora.net> wrote: >> >> On 02/09/11 19:06, Stack wrote: >>> >>> What do folks think? >> >> >> Not putting the log into hdfs seems like a good idea. > > I was somehow thinking the opposite as it makes irrecoverable machine > failures much more problematic. What makes you say it's a good idea? >
