+1 on all of this below. I'm all for frequent releases. Big features move to branches and the author is required to keep it up against whatever the current trunk is.
And by forcing ourselves to keep features/improvements into trunk rather than into the currently active branch, we will incentivize ourselves to push forward new releases to get the goodies ;) JG > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:22 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > Should we try to have more frequent, smaller releases? Maybe 3-4 a year. > > I'd be in favor of this. > > Our 0.92 has gotten way too fat and a little difficult to land because its > busting > at seams with good stuff. It was let run too long. > > > For example I would almost say that the performance enhancements from > > the Facebook guys would warrant a new (performance) release "shortly" > after 0.92. > > > > Sounds good to me too. > > St.Ack
