+1

dev@ is not really possible to follow anymore, unless full time on HBase.


Best regards,


      - Andy




>________________________________
>From: Ted Yu <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 3:03 PM
>Subject: suggestion for smoother code review process
>
>Hi,
>We have been using review board for a while to conduct code review.
>One aspect I don't like the integration is that every round of review would
>result in the summary and list of files (both of which could be long) to be
>reposted to JIRA.
>For a large project, such as HBASE-2856 or HBASE-3777, it is impossible
>(without exaggeration) for a developer who didn't closely follow the
>development to understand what was going on.
>
>I want to share what I have been doing recently (by not commenting on review
>board, if possible):
>I would quote the snippet of code in the patch and make my comment
>
>I think the person asking for review can post the url for review board
>request on the JIRA. By not filling Bugs field, we don't incur extra
>housekeeping that I mentioned earlier.
>If the Groups and People fields are filled properly, there is no risk of
>losing review request. In the worst case, one sentence on the JIRA can
>remind related people to look at the patch again.
>
>Note the above is just personally advice. Please don't interpret it as rule
>or anything like that.
>
>Cheers
>
>
>

Reply via email to