> There will be some deployment of .22 in big shops as far as I know.
Who are these "big shops"? AFAIK, compared to 0.20.x or 0.23, 0.22 has a number of regressions. We need to assess how healthy 0.22 is. How much time/attention should the HBase community pay to what might be a DoA/ignored release? Or is that in fact the case (that it is DoA...)? Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) >________________________________ >From: Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> >To: [email protected]; Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 12:51 PM >Subject: Re: proper pace for JIRA integration > >On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >> There was also some work to insure that we compile and run against 0.22, but >> I don't think anyone would actually deploy and use such a configuration. > >There will be some deployment of .22 in big shops as far as I know. Whether >they >will also deploy HBase .92 or something else on top of it -- that >remains to be seen. > >Well, my question was basically about what post .21 release of Hadoop HBase >.92 might be interested in supporting out of the box and it looks like >the answer is >.22. I'll setup an integration validation job over here and will >report the results: > http://bigtop01.cloudera.org:8080/view/Hadoop%200.22/ >(btw, once Bigtop 0.2.0 gets release we'll have a trunk that can >support 0.20.205 + .92). > >Of course, we can all benefit from more integration tests available in >Bigtop, so if the community >could donate some of the integration tests, that I'm sure folks tend >to have in various >forms, that'll make it even easier for us to assess how healthy .92 is. > >Thanks, >Roman. > > >
