Hi Eric,
> From: Eric Yang <[email protected]> > The patch does not advertise Secure HBase, but provides ability to setup > non-secure HBase on Secure HDFS. It would be a release note documentation Yes, as long as the result as-is now is not advertised as a secure system, because it will not be. Earlier you said: >>> It is optional to use the configuration scripts, but it is a good >>> starting point to show people how to configure a secure cluster. which was at the heart of my objection, because that may be only true right now for core. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) ----- Original Message ----- > From: Eric Yang <[email protected]> > To: [email protected]; Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 6:26 PM > Subject: Re: An 0.92.0 Release Candidate this week? > > Hi Andrew, > > The patch does not advertise Secure HBase, but provides ability to setup > non-secure HBase on Secure HDFS. It would be a release note documentation > process to set the right expectation. Secure HBase features can be added > separate from setup scripts. Does this sound like reasonable? Once > HBASE-2742 > and HBASE-3025 are committed. Additional knobs can be added to the setup > script > in separate jiras. Would this work? It would be helpful to keep evolution > progressing than patch left out and become out of date. > > regards, > Eric > > On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > >> Eric, >> >>> It is optional to use the configuration scripts, but it is a good > starting point >>> to show people how to configure a secure cluster. >> >> >> As I mentioned on 4415, the script as is won't set up "secure > HBase" as it will be defined beyond just HDFS level stuff. I think it is > premature. >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Eric Yang <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 5:25 PM >>> Subject: Re: An 0.92.0 Release Candidate this week? >>> >>> T he configuration script is useful tool to generate configuration. > The >>> recommended script is creating a pattern for user to manage > configuration >>> consistently across Hadoop related projects. >>> It is optional to use the configuration scripts, but it is a good > starting point >>> to show people how to configure a secure cluster. >>> >>> regards, >>> Eric >>> >>> On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:17 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: >>> >>>> Regarding HBASE-4415 and related, it makes me nervous to add it in >>>> just before we cut the RC but at the same time I feel like I > don't >>>> fully understand what it's doing. Are we adding a new mandatory >>>> configuration step? >>>> >>>> Thx for clarifying. >>>> >>>> J-D >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Eric Yang > <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Stack, >>>>> >>>>> I sent you an email after our meetings last week. I am not > sure if my >>>>> email was received. Here are a couple issues that would > improve >>>>> Hadoop 0.20.205.0 and HBase 0.92 integration. >>>>> >>>>> HBASE-4415 >>>>> HBASE-4523 >>>>> HBASE-4535 >>>>> HBASE-4635 >>>>> HBASE-4498 >>>>> >>>>> We are hopping if those issues can be committed before RC0? > Thanks >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Eric >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Stack > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Ted Yu > <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/91 passed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shall we target Friday for RC0 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. I hope to get an RC up this week. >>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
