Jira was down last night. A new patch has been uploaded for HBASE-4337 to match HBase directory layout same as Hadoop directory layout. The new share directory is undone for the existing directory layout. The default directory layout is the existing HBase layout.
The binary only layout, and can be build using: mvn clean package -P binary,deb,rpm -DskipTests Patch for HBASE-4337 depends on HBASE-4415, 4523, 4635, 4498. Let me know if there is any questions or concerns. Thanks regards, Eric On Nov 2, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Eric Yang wrote: > Those patches provides: > > - A script that can configure HBase. > - Ability to setup unsecure HBase on Secure Hadoop. > > Those jiras provide the basics setup which integrate well with other Hadoop > components, and I plan to get HBASE-4337 done by tomorrow. > > regards, > Eric > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 9:53 AM, Stack wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> For improving installation experience for HBase 0.92 with Hadoop 0.20.205, >>> I wish we could get these patches >>> into 0.92.0 RC: >>> >>> HBASE-4415 Add configuration script for setup HBase (hbase-setup-conf.sh) >>> HBASE-4523 dfs.support.append config should be present in the hadoop >>> configs, we should remove them from hbase so the user is not confused when >>> they see the config in 2 places >>> HBASE-4535 hbase-env.sh in hbase rpm does not set HBASE_CONF_DIR >>> HBASE-4635 Remove dependency of java for rpm/deb packaging >>> HBASE-4498 HBase RPM/DEB packages attempt to setup ZooKeeper environment >>> incorrectly >>> >>> Patches are available for all jiras and reviewed. >>> >> >> These patches look innocuous enough. If they all go in, what will we >> have? A script that can install and configure an hbase? We'll have a >> new /share dir in our tar ball when its undone. What else will they >> give us? >> >> Thanks Eric, >> St.Ack >
