On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to lars's suggestion. Personally, I think its pretty critical to get > the acid guarantee to actually be true. A handful of our customers want to > be able to rely on this. Don't think you can really call it a guarantee > if you can't handle flushes.... > > Lars -- I'll take a look at the bulk load cases today. >
Getting it into second RC is fine by me. I think we should get it in. Jon, does TestHBaseFsck pass reliably for you on 0.92 branch (Or anyone else?). It fails for me pretty reliably. St.Ack
