Hey JD/Stack, I'm curious: what specific revision number from October are you running at SU?
As we look towards 0.90.5 it would be good to draw a line in the branch where we know that it's "known stable for SU", and focus our testing on patches that came into the branch after that point. -Todd On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey devs, > > I know everyone's focusing on 0.92 and all, but I think we need a > 0.90.5 to ease some of the support pain. For example, I helped drevell > on IRC today with something that turned out to be a nasty version of > HBASE-4168. Basically: > > - Shut down the machine that has .META. (or maybe even -ROOT-) > - Let the master replay the logs > - Once it's done, it reassigns .META. but the CT's can't find it > because they are stuck on NoRouteToHostException (that's HBASE-4168) > - Master is stuck > - In their case it unstuck itself === >30min later === when they > rebooted the machine and the master started getting ConnectionRefused > instead. > > There's a lot of other good stuff in there that people might need. At > SU we've been running on a snapshot of 0.90 from late October. > > J-D > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
