Stack, 4633's summary and the workaround dont go together. There is a rpc timeout related chatter (I am guilty) in 4633 which might confuse reader joining the party late.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > 2011/12/5 Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: >> Lars: >> What you proposed below should be close to what netty does. >> Instead of managing the complexity of NIO related code, we can delegate to >> netty as what asynchbase does. >> This discussion should be under a different thread / JIRA. >> >> sendParam() is called by HBaseClient.call() which is called by >> WritableRpcEngine and SecureRpcEngine. >> Can you elaborate on what you think the call hierarchy should be ? >> >> Overall, I think we can resolve HBASE-4633 and put further discussion under >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4956 >> > > We need the workaround though, don't we Ted? We could commit the > workaround as part of hbase-4633? (Thanks for opening hbase-4956) > > St.Ack
