I've been testing the RC for a while, works great, but HBASE-4976 is a killer so -1 for me.
J-D On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > The first hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download: > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0/ > > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball. Pick your poison. > > HBase 0.92.0 includes a raft of new features including: coprocessors, > security, a new (self-migrating) file format, distributed log > splitting, etc. There's been > 600 fixes since 0.90. See the list > here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5 > > See the hbase book for the low-down on what hadoop version this > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > > There is no migration necessary. A shutdown and restart after putting > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work). That said, once you have moved > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has > been made. > > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0? Take it for a spin. > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by December 12th. > > Yours, > The HBasistas > > P.S. If you are thinking of going to 0.92 anytime soon, help us out w/ > the testing if you can. This period while we are putting up release > candidates is the best time for trying stuff out because if you find > an ugly bug, it'll be fixed pretty tout de suite
