All are important correctness fixes, except for HBASE-5163 which would make 0.92 Jenkins build more stable - considering the build takes around two hours.
Maybe we can declare Jenkins build #243 which is ongoing as 0.92.0 ? Assuming it passes. Just my two cents. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote: > Are all 6 required? If not, which ones are and how important are they > in your opinion so that they need to be in 0.92.0? If haven't looked > over them in too great details but you seem in the know so that's why > I ask #lazyfriday. > > Regarding their "fix version", they should have been committed under > 0.92.1 AFAIK (and changed if there's a new RC) but no biggie. > > J-D > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since last Sunday, 6 checkins have gone in under 0.92.0 section in > > CHANGES.txt > > > > I am fine with re-categorizing them to go under 0.92.1 > > > > Or should we evaluate the 6 checkins ? I personally think the current > 0.92 > > Jenkins build would be more robust than RC3. > > > > Cheers > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> I've been testing this under heavy write loads and I also looked at > >> replication. On previous RCs I did many read tests and AFAIK that > >> didn't change so I didn't go through that again. I think this is a > >> solid release, and 0.92.1 will take care of bugs that didn't make it > >> in time. > >> > >> J-D > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download: > >> > > >> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-3/ > >> > > >> > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins. > >> > > >> > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0 and zookeeper 3.4.2. > >> > > >> > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a wagon-load of new features > >> > including coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format, > >> > distributed log splitting, etc. There's been > 660 fixes since 0.90. > >> > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5 > >> > > >> > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this > >> > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > >> > > >> > There is no migration necessary. A shutdown and restart after putting > >> > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart > >> > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work). That said, once you have moved > >> > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has > >> > been made. > >> > > >> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0? Take it for a spin. > >> > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by Martin Luther King Day, January > 16th, > >> 2012. > >> > > >> > Yours, > >> > The HBasistas > >> > > >> > P.S. This candidate is looking pretty good. If you are thinking of > >> using 0.92.0 > >> > any time soon, we would suggest that you dig in now and try it. > Thanks. > >> >
