+1. This has been in RC an state for quite a while now and has been looping some of the Bigtop system tests for a long time. I'm going to echo Lars, Andrew, etc about getting it out and then getting a 0.92.1 out soon after. The bugs Jimmy and I have found and been diagnosing don't seem to be regressions from 0.90.x.
Jon. On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > The fourth hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download: > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-3/ > > I've posted a secure and an insecure tarball built by jenkins. > > This RC bundles hadoop 1.0.0 and zookeeper 3.4.2. > > As said previous, HBase 0.92.0 includes a wagon-load of new features > including coprocessors, security, a new (self-migrating) file format, > distributed log splitting, etc. There's been > 660 fixes since 0.90. > See the list here: http://su.pr/1VZzl5 > > See the hbase manual for the low-down on what hadoop version this > release will run on: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > > There is no migration necessary. A shutdown and restart after putting > in place the new HBase should be all thats involved (A rolling restart > from 0.90.x to 0.92.0 will not work). That said, once you have moved > to 0.92.x, there is no going back to 0.90.x after the transition has > been made. > > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.92.0? Take it for a spin. > Check out the doc. Vote +1/-1 by Martin Luther King Day, January 16th, > 2012. > > Yours, > The HBasistas > > P.S. This candidate is looking pretty good. If you are thinking of using > 0.92.0 > any time soon, we would suggest that you dig in now and try it. Thanks. > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
