Hey Ram, I'm still interested in the 0.90 branch and will spend some time testing the RC.
Keep up the good work! Jon. On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote: > (Coming in a little late, sorry about that) > > If HBASE-5196 is a regression from previous versions, then definitely > -1. If not, I don't see why we'd sink the RC and even more so since it > has no unit test which means it could add more bugs to a bug fix > release. > > That said, you guys can still -1 this RC if you want. > > Personally I'm done with the 0.90 branch and I'm focussing my efforts > on getting 0.92 in production here. > > J-D > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is always better to get in a patch with test case. But if it takes > a little more time to get the test case can we verify the patch with good > cluster testing and raise a JIRA for the test case integration that Stack > gives. > > > > By this way we can get the patch in the release and also satisfies > Todd's suggestion. > > > > Any comments so that i can raise a test task for the same. > > > > Regards > > Ram > > ________________________________________ > > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2012 8:13 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: 0.90.6 Release status > > > > Stack said he would come up with some test for hbase-5179. > > Suppose that takes a few more days, do you plan to check in the fix into > 0.90 branch ? > > > > According to Todd's suggestion earlier, a Jira shouldn't be open for too > long during which time patches continuously get checked in. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Ramakrishna s vasudevan < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Devs > >> > >> After the first RC for 0.90.6 was taken > >> HBASE-5196 - Failure in region split after PONR could cause region hole > >> HBASE-5153 - Add retry logic in > HConnectionImplementation#resetZooKeeperTrackers > >> > >> The above 2 defects have been committed. > >> > >> HBASE-5179 - Concurrent processing of processFaileOver and > ServerShutdownHandler may cause region to be assigned before log splitting > is completed, causing data loss > >> HBASE-5225 - Backport HBASE-3845 -data loss because lastSeqWritten can > miss memstore edits > >> HBASE-5235 - HLogSplitter writer thread's streams not getting closed > when any of the writer threads has exceptions. > >> HBASE-5237 - Addendum for HBASE-5160 and HBASE-4397 > >> > >> HBASE-5179 - is almost in a final stage for committing. Thanks to > Chunhui, Ted and Jinchao for persisting on the defect. > >> > >> The above defects were found during the testing for RC0. Hence i would > like to cut another RC once the above > >> defects goes into 0.90. By tomorrow 22nd January i would like to take > a release cut. > >> Please let me know your suggestions/opinions. > >> > >> Regards > >> Ram > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
