Can't believe I missed that. I haven't been paying enough attention to upstream.
However, this isn't the worst thing that could have happened, without HBASE-5195 in the upstream sources security isn't going to adequately protect Gets. Also there is a shell nit to fix (HBASE-5265). Put it 0.94. No problem. It wouldn't be unreasonable to consider coprocessors more baked than security in upstream. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) >________________________________ > From: Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:29 AM >Subject: No security sources in 0.92.0 release tarballs. > >Ugh, it looks like we all missed that 0.92.0 release tarballs (both >security compile and normal) do not contain any of the source of the >security work. > >Jon. > >-- >// Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >// Software Engineer, Cloudera >// [email protected] > > >
