Yeah, so - Security (basically another coprocessor for inclusion in mainline, like Constraints)
if not in 0.92.1. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) >________________________________ > From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> >To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org> >Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:28 AM >Subject: Re: hbase 0.94.0 > >A limited set of changes so we can get it out on that kind of timeframe. :-) > > - Constraints (is ready to go, is a coprocessor, so is in the large just a >new package to drop in) > > - Useful utilities for ops: > > - LoadTestTool (if Ted didn't end up backporting this into 0.92) > > - The store file locality thing I have mostly done, will finish it > > - Mikhail and crew's ongoing optimizations (HBASE-4218, etc.), the ones he >considers fully baked > >I saw wire compatibility mentioned, for 0.96 but perhaps optional/transitional >code in 0.94 as well. This is something we would try out and beat up upon in >staging in earnest. > >Best regards, > > - Andy > >Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via >Tom White) > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> >>To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org> >>Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:34 PM >>Subject: hbase 0.94.0 >> >>Lets branch end of february? No new features thereafter. Is this too >>close in? Would be grand if 0.94.0 shipped before hbasecon. What >>should 0.94.0 have in it? I don't mind if the list is short. >> >>Unless someone else wants too, I don't mind being release manager >>(will try to run a tighter ship this time around). >> >>St.Ack >> >> >> > >
