On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Gregory Chanan <[email protected]>wrote:
> Enis, > > You mean until Tuesday (the 21st), right? > > Ops, my bad. Will be there today. Enis > Greg > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > While working on keeping bw compatibility for > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5371, I realized that it > might > > be a good idea to include the co-processor interfaces into the scope as > > well. Although they are marked as advanced API's, and even if you wrap > them > > under some java class, there will be need to access the functionality > from > > clients, and they should be treated the same way as 3 and 4. Just > something > > to consider until Thursday, I'll try to be there as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Enis > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Jeff Whiting <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > What I'm suggesting may not be possible but it seems like it is worth > > > > keeping in mind through the design and implementation process. > > > > > > > > > > There is already proof that what you suggest is possible. asynchbase > > > is a 'lighter', 'incomplete' but > > > complete-enough-for-a-particular-purpose client that does much of what > > > you talk of except the bit about being in another language. > > > > > > St.Ack > > > > > >
