Andy - could you please start a discussion? We could, at the very least, mark UGI as LimitedPrivate for HBase and work with you guys to maintain compatibility for the future. Makes sense?
thanks, Arun On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > After that, I believe we can merge the security sources in. However we may > have an issue going forward because UGI is an unstable/private API. Needs > sorting out with core at some point. > > Best regards, > > - Andy > > > On Mar 6, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ...however we can't easily build a single artifact because the secure RPC >>> engine, as it interacts with the Hadoop auth framework, must use >>> UserGroupInformation. >>> >> >> OK. So security story needs a bit of work. Sounds like we have >> enough votes though to require hadoop 1.0.0 at least in 0.96. >> >> St.Ack -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/
