I think this idea is good as well. - Dave
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds good to me (not sure how to add it but between a bunch of us, > we should be able to figure it out). > > St.Ack > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:29 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think this is a great idea. > > > > Should we adopt this here? > > I'm +1. Who else? > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Harsh J <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected]; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM > > Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94 > > > > Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix > > vs. Targeted branch versions? > > > > Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at > http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1 > > > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were > marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as > fixed. > >> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at > through the jira issues. > >> > >> I would like to request to either: > >> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or > >> > >> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or > >> > >> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to > 0.94) > >> > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -- Lars > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Harsh J >
