Stack, Sounds good.
I"m focusing on HBASE-5563 currently (this potentially affects many places). The others are more isolated and should be quicker to get through. Stack if you want to do them today feel free -- I'll probably can't get to them until it tomorrow. Jon. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:40 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Now that HBASE-4608 is committed I'm planning to create an RC soon. > > Is anybody aware of any issue that needs to get in before an RC? If so, > please let me know. > > > > I was thinking HBASE-5128 "[uber hbck] Enable hbck to automatically > repair table integrity problems as well as region consistency problems > while online." but I see Ted beat me to it. Rather than our gateing > 0.94 on working out this WIP, perhaps JonH, you could do a smaller > patch of critical core changes you need like the addition of the > offline call to the Master Interface, the deprecation Ted mentions, > and there was the comparator addition in HRI? If you got those things > into core, then hbck work could carry on independent of 0.94... > > If you want I could do the surgery on 5128 to extract core changes. > > St.Ack > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
