The second scenario. Thanks
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:26 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > HBASE-5258 is not in 0.94. Did you mean a different one? > > Or are you saying that you deployed HBASE-5258 locally to your 0.92 > version, and that that was the reason you could not test rolling upgrade to > 0.94? > > Thanks. > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:11 PM > Subject: Re: ANN: The first hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available > for download > > The change was for HBASE-5258 > > Incompatibility was expected. > > Thanks > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I planned to perform rolling restart from (our variant of) 0.92 to > 0.94.0 > > > but found out that some internal changes prevented region server to > talk > > to > > > 0.94.0 master. > > > > What changes? Do you have logs from that time? > > St.Ack > > >
