On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW we could pull either or both out, but instant schema alter hasn't > been in a released version yet so it's unlikely it'll bother someone > while the other is already in use (like here). > > Opinions? >
Lets not have two broke schema editors. Lets have just one broke schema editor. Would suggest back out instant schema alter and work on hardening 'Online schema update' (though I dislike this one too.. its got its fingers in all over the codebase). St.Ack
