+1 to evaluating a proposal for the rowcache. It could be very beneficial to certain applications. The challenge is to reduce the memory overhad per cached data.
-dhruba On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Before opening the issue, I though I should ask around first. What do you > think about a keyvalue cache sitting on top of the block cache? It is > mentioned in the big table paper, and it seems that zipfian kv access > patterns might benefit from something like this a lot. I could not find > anybody who proposed that before. > > What do you guys think? Should we pursue a kv query-cache. My gut feeling > says that especially for some workloads we might gain significant > performance improvements, but we cannot verify it, until we implement and > profile it, right? > > Thanks, > Enis > -- Subscribe to my posts at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
