On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Trezzo <ctre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some engineers at Google have come to the conclusion that using > required does more harm than good; they prefer to use only > optional and repeated. However, this view is not universal." > > Thoughts?
I agree we should review the use of 'required'. Now's the time to make modifications before we're locked in for cross-version compatibility. Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
