On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Last time we were talking Lars (H.) raised the issue that we might need a > stable base while 0.96, and its successors are fully baked in for > production use. So, it seems that 0.94 branch releases will be a deployment > target for some time at least on some of the organizations for some time. > We have been backporting a lot of stuff already from trunk into 0.94, but I > want to discuss whether we should establish an "official" policy of what > should be backported or not. We will definitely want bug fixes in, but > what about new UI stuff, or integration tests, etc. If we can agree on > general guidelines at least, it will be then easier to decide on a > patch-by-patch basis. What do you guys think? >
I'd think that 0.94 branch gets bug fixes only. Anything else than that gets confusing. Do we want to have a 0.96 release that is not pb, branched from 0.94? Into this 0.96 we'd backport non-pb stuff -- tests and 'safe' features? pb could then come out in a 0.98? (Let me start a 0.96 thread. I think we're close) St.Ack
