The same principal should guide 0.94.x, right ? On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for your comment, Todd. > > > > I have observed some flexibility in this regard from, say cdh3u4a: > > > > > http://archive.cloudera.com/ebay/cdh3u4a-rc1/cdh/3/hbase-0.92.1+82.releasenotes.html > > > > Irrelevant. Off-topic. Probably info. that doesn't belong on a > public list (Also of a kind that matches specious argument made at > tail of HBASE-6726 where a feature in production on different branches > somehow makes it so its stable in a different branch). > > +1 on Todd's original sentiment (He beat me too it); bug-fixes only in > old branches especially the higher the point version. > > St.Ack >
