Thanks Elliot for your validation effort. 

Appreciate it. 



On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com> wrote:

> So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or
> something.  I can't seem to re-produce that error. So I'm fully +1.
> Sorry for the false alarm.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com> 
> wrote:
>> I'm +1'ish
>> 
>> Spun up a 0.92.1 cluster wrote some data.  Then spun up a 0.92.2RC and
>> everything worked.
>> Ran LoadTestTool while killing region servers.  Everything recovered well.
>> Ran PerformanceEvaluation everything went well
>> 
>> 
>> However when trying to manually split a table while tests were running
>> I was unable to.  On investigating more I found that manual splits
>> appear to be broken in 0.92.  So I filed HBASE-6767.  I don't think
>> it's enough to sink the rc but it was something that I noticed.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> We're having more and more releases across 0.92, 0.94 and soon 0.96
>>> branches.
>>> It would be wise to revisit the historical convention.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for bringing this up, J-D.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans 
>>> <jdcry...@apache.org>wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers.  Maybe hang a little while to
>>>>> get another one or so?
>>>> 
>>>> Little nit, it's actually 3 PMC members. Historically committers were
>>>> also PMC members but this changed recently.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm referring to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>> 
>>>> We may want to eventually do like Hadoop and have our own bylaws:
>>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html
>>>> 
>>>> J-D
>>>> 

Reply via email to