Thanks Elliot for your validation effort. Appreciate it.
On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com> wrote: > So it looks like I must have just caught a region as it was moving or > something. I can't seem to re-produce that error. So I'm fully +1. > Sorry for the false alarm. > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com> > wrote: >> I'm +1'ish >> >> Spun up a 0.92.1 cluster wrote some data. Then spun up a 0.92.2RC and >> everything worked. >> Ran LoadTestTool while killing region servers. Everything recovered well. >> Ran PerformanceEvaluation everything went well >> >> >> However when trying to manually split a table while tests were running >> I was unable to. On investigating more I found that manual splits >> appear to be broken in 0.92. So I filed HBASE-6767. I don't think >> it's enough to sink the rc but it was something that I noticed. >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> We're having more and more releases across 0.92, 0.94 and soon 0.96 >>> branches. >>> It would be wise to revisit the historical convention. >>> >>> Thanks for bringing this up, J-D. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans >>> <jdcry...@apache.org>wrote: >>> >>>>> Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers. Maybe hang a little while to >>>>> get another one or so? >>>> >>>> Little nit, it's actually 3 PMC members. Historically committers were >>>> also PMC members but this changed recently. >>>> >>>> I'm referring to http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>> >>>> We may want to eventually do like Hadoop and have our own bylaws: >>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html >>>> >>>> J-D >>>>