On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Gregory Chanan <gcha...@cloudera.com> wrote: > How are we deciding what counts as a component? Based on what people say > here?
Yes. I think that is ok. If the thing can be described and someone has volunteered to look after it, then it 'exists'. > Some of these seem vastly different in scope (e.g. Client vs > HalfStoreFile). > Agreed. > Also, will it be obvious, from the JIRA, who I need to get reviews from and > how many? From Stack's e-mail it sounds like clicking on the component > will give you a list of names; perhaps we should make it explicit in that > link that one +1 is enough for anyone on this list, otherwise two +1s are > necessary. Good suggestion. I'll do this. > We need to make it clear what the process is for new > contributors (more process is okay, but it needs to be fair and explicit). > Agreed. I'll add a section to our community chapter in refguide w/ the few rules we came up w/ here. > What about patches that touch more than one component? > Both component owners? Or a component owner and a +1 from someone other than author (That'd align w/ our two +1s from any contributor equating to a component owners' +1... sort of). St.Ack
