That last little bit of Metrics migration to Metrics2 (hbase-4050) should probably go in so that we're not straddling the different versions.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > This depends on if the master changes that use ZK multi ops will go in as > an option that can be toggled by config, or as a replacement? > > If you run secure clusters then 3.4.5 (with ZOOKEEPER-1550) is what you > want to use regardless. > > On Tuesday, October 2, 2012, lars hofhansl wrote: > > > You mean as build time dependency, right? (Not sure now) > > > > I think we have said in the past it's not a runtime dependency. > > > > Yeah, what I was trying to say was to require ZK 3.4.4 to run HBase. > > Maybe 0.96 is too early for that, because we probably do not want to file > > more jiras against to remove now obsolete related code. > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Stack <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > > Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 3:19 PM > > Subject: Re: 0.96.0 > > > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > +1 for doing it now for 0.96. > > > > > > > We already have 3.4.4 as dependency. > > > > But sounds like we are saying that when you upgrade your hbase to > > 0.96, you need to also update your zk to 3.4.4 because hbase wants to > > use 3.4 zk features? Is that what we're saying? > > > > Good stuff, > > St.Ack > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
