+1 for deprecation. Will bring any users out of the woodwork who might not see this discussion at least.
On Friday, December 7, 2012, Jesse Yates wrote: > According to the thrift2 docs, it is the 'right' way to access HBase - the > thrift package is based on an older HBase interface that no longer exists. > Seems like a reasonable case for deprecation in the next release and > dropping it all together after. > ------------------- > Jesse Yates > @jesse_yates > jyates.github.com > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Stack <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jimmy Xiang > > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > Since 0.96 is a singularity, is it a time to deprecate thrift finally? > > > > > > Or we can use thrift2 by default, and keep thrift around more? > > > > > > What's the pros and cons to switch to thrift2? > > > > > > > Interesting notion. Could move thrift2 to thrift altogether. Would need > > to make sure thrift2 has all from thrift1. > > St.Ack > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
