I wouldn't mind posting test results on the resolution comment of a 0.94 commit, but there have a couple of times where all tests have passed for me locally but then failed up on ASF Jenkins. One dev box may not be much like another. I think the best option is to set up ASF Jenkins for what you think we need, Ted.
On Friday, December 28, 2012, Ted Yu wrote: > Since we don't have Hadoop QA for 0.94 patches yet, does it make sense for > either contributor (patch owner) or the committer who plans to integrate > the patch to present test suite result before integration ? > > There is subtle difference between 0.94 and trunk which may lead to > unexpected results. > > Cheers > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Enis Söztutar > <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > I think it is not a matter of running the tests N times, but more so on > > running different platforms. From our builds, what we see most often is > > that the test runs just fine under CentOS 6, but becomes more flaky under > > CentOS 5 possibly b/c of thread scheduling differences. Moreover, under > > windows, the threads are not immediately scheduled to run after start() > > which causes further race conditions which does not occur so frequently > > under *nix systems. > > > > For 0.94 QA, theoretically we should not this. However in practice I see > > that if there is a brave soul to work on it, we will find it useful. > > > > Enis > > > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:37 PM, lars hofhansl > > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > > > > wrote: > > > > > If we make it too onerous we'll see fewer contributions especially in > the > > > test area. :) > > > > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
