Francis reminded me that ZOOKEEPER-1437 is a client side fix. So our situation is simplified: 0.94.5 ships with zookeeper 3.4.5 client. HBASE-7771 should be included.
Cheers On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Auto-detection may be difficult. > 0.94.5 uses the following config param for usage of multi() feature in > zookeeper 3.4 : > > <property> > <name>hbase.zookeeper.useMulti</name> > <value>false</value> > > Since the issue HBASE-7771 tries to solve affects zookeeper 3.4.4 and > later version(s), the above config param would not suffice (for current > discussion). > > Cheers > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: > >> Yes, I can easily upgrade to 3.4.5, but I think some might not want to >> if zookeeper is used by some other applications. >> >> So I agree that we should consider something to detect ZK version and >> decide, based on that, ifthe workaround should be used. And if this >> can be done automatically instead of setting up something in the conf >> files, it's even better... >> >> 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: >> > This is tricky. >> > Is it possible to upgrade standalone zookeeper to 3.4.5 when you >> upgrade to >> > HBase 0.94.5 ? >> > >> > Anyway, looks like we need some config parameter that tells us the >> version >> > of standalone zookeeper :-) so that we can decide whether the workaround >> > should be used. >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < >> > jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Ted, >> >> >> >> Does it mean that 0.94.5 will not work anymore for those running >> >> zookeeper separatly with a version < 3.4.5? >> >> >> >> I'm running 3.4.3 in my cluster... >> >> >> >> JM >> >> >> >> 2013/2/5, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>: >> >> > Patch is available for: >> >> > HBASE-7771 Secure HBase Client in MR job causes tasks to wait forever >> >> > >> >> > It removes the workaround from HBASE-4791 which went into 0.94.4 >> >> > >> >> > Now that zookeeper 3.4.5 is used by 0.94.5, I think HBASE-7771 should >> >> > go >> >> > into 0.94.5 >> >> > >> >> > My two cents. >> >> > >> >> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:29 AM, lars hofhansl <la...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> The 1st 0.94.5 RC is available for download at >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.5-rc0/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >> >> >> >> >> >> 0.94.5 is a bug fix release. This RC has 66 issues resolved against >> >> >> it, >> >> >> contributed by 26 individuals. >> >> >> These are mostly bug fixes. Also fixed is a long standing bug in >> >> >> replication along with lots of random test failures. >> >> >> >> >> >> The full list of changes is available here: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12323874 >> >> >> >> >> >> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, >> and >> >> >> vote +1/-1 by February 11th on whether we should release this as >> >> >> 0.94.5. >> >> >> >> >> >> The release testing spreadsheet is here: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGNTUHVVY1lVZnpPT2Z5b0l2c3RoSHc#gid=0 >> >> >> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, >> >> >> so >> >> >> that we can gauge the coverage) >> >> >> >> >> >> HBase continues to be actively maintained; changes are coming in at >> a >> >> >> rate >> >> >> of about two commits per day. >> >> >> There is no slow down in this RC with 66 commits over the course of >> >> about >> >> >> a month. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Lars >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >
