You could do that, or apply the mega patch to trunk, at this point. commit a35267ff2ab727c72493df160b8c03da05a1547d Author: Michael Stack <[email protected]> Date: Tue Feb 12 18:17:34 2013 +0000
Jon. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jon, > > If I want to give it a try, do I "simply" have to extract for the GIT > link you sent and build from there? > > JM > > 2013/2/12, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]>: >> Hey all, >> >> We did a branch merge of the snapshot branch (hbase-6055 and >> hbase-7290 combined) with trunk on 2/1/13. This merge initially had >> several always broken tests but since then Ted, Matteo and myself >> fixed all the always-broken unit tests. I've merged again today >> 2/12/13 [1], and posted a patch on HBASE-7290 for the hadoopqa bot to >> run. >> >> There are primarily four of us who worked on this branch -- Jesse Y, >> Matteo, Ted Yu and myself, so if we each +1, technically we would have >> the 3 +1's required and could merge. I wanted to solicit +1's from >> the four who worked on it (all committers now) and also find out if >> anyone else has started reviewing the code or intends to in the next >> few days. It is a large patch (1.3MB) that I can post on review >> board, but it may be easier to understand by going to the different >> individual jiras (some of which have design docs). Generally we've >> been using a looser of review then commit for each of the subtasks. If >> I get clean test runs from the QA bot and +1's from the folks who >> worked on it or planned on reviewing it, I'd like merge sooner rather >> than later. >> >> On the unit testing front, I've personally gotten one error-free unit >> tests runs runs and one with a failure in hbase-examples: >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.example.TestBulkDeleteProtocol.testBulkDeleteFamily. >> >> On the system testing side, I've been testing the pre-merge version >> outlined by Aleks [2] and it had been fairly robust on a 5 node >> cluster with fault injection. I've also done some testing on a 20 >> node cluster (no fault injection) and a few runs on a 100 node cluster >> where the snapshoting feature has been robust. >> >> Thanks, >> Jon. >> >> [1] https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/snapshot-merge-0212 >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/pdbkq654ipuxyt6a >> >> -- >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera >> // [email protected] >> -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
