Sure, thanks, lars ! I am retouching this issue after a while so my memory is a little vague on it and I may have missed something there...
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > I commented on the jira. Not sure the fix is correct. Let's take the > discussion there. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Ted Yu <[email protected]> > *To:* Varun Sharma <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2013 1:28 PM > *Subject:* Re: Patch for HBase 7295 > > I commented on the JIRA. > Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in. > > Cheers > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Could someone take a look ? Thanks ! > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi Ted, > >> > >> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily > >> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly > against > >> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not > >> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 > was > >> not applying cleanly against trunk. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Varun > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3 > >>> > >>> In your production, what version are you using ? > >>> > >>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply > >>> cleanly, respectively ? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back > and > >>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been > >>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone > take > >>> a > >>> > look ? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks > >>> > Varun > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >
