I got the following test failures running 0.94 against 2.0.4-SNAPSHOT: Failed tests: testRetrying(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor): reader: count=2, t=null testMROnTable(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv)
testMROnTableWithTimestamp(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv) testMROnTableWithCustomMapper(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv) testBulkOutputWithoutAnExistingTable(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv) Tests in error: testGetRegionsCatalogTables(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor): Failed after attempts=10, exceptions:(..) testTableExists(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor): Connection refused testGetRegion(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor): Connection refused testScanMetaForTable(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor) testSimpleCase(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport) testMetaExport(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport) testWithDeletes(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport) testWithFilter(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportExport) On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Enis Söztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > Francis here says that they are running 94 with 23 in production here : > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7834?focusedCommentId=13577938&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13577938 > > If not we can file a bug if there is enough interest. However, I would > imagine hadoop2 compile is more interesting. > > It will not hurt to have 94 build with hadoop2 I guess. > > Enis > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'd prefer hbase compiling over hadoop 2.0.x. I've got one instance with > > the internally and its just been failing on TestRowCounter and > > TestImportExport frequently. > > > > Jon. > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Seems more useful than HBase on Hadoop 0.23. > > > I think we should either retire the HBase-on-0.23 tests or move them to > > > Hadoop 2.0. I'd vote the latter. > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Stack <[email protected]> > > > To: HBase Dev List <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:41 PM > > > Subject: Re: HBase 0.94 build on top of hadoop 2.0 > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Should we have a standalone build for hadoop 2.0 ? > > > > > > > > > > I would say no. File an issue though. If a patch for hbase to make it > > > work, attach it. > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > > // [email protected] > > >
