I'm wondering, what is our goal with this RC? Are we expecting deep testing like for the 0.94 RCs? Or it's more kind a of internal RC for our own testing? Should we expect also some migration testing (0.94 to 0.95)?
Also, will it be possible to have a list of the known issues? That might avoid some noise from too many people re-reporting that? And last, I agree that we really should put emphasis on the fact that this release is a developper release and 0.95 will never be a production one. +1 JM 2013/3/30 ramkrishna vasudevan <[email protected]>: > Agree. +1. > > Regards > Ram > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Fair enough. >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Stack <[email protected]> >> To: HBase Dev List <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected] >> > >> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 8:32 PM >> Subject: Re: Any objections to my putting up a 0.95.0RC? >> >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > Should we call it "beta" as some things are known not to work? >> > >> >> I'd rather not. >> >> Rather, lets just make sure that we do the messaging so folks get that odd >> number means it is not for production. >> >> St.Ack >>
