I ran the performances tests against 0.95.0RC1. While filteredScan, read and writes got nice improvements (18% faster for the reads), scans seems to be negatively impacted (32% slower for scanRange100).
Results are there: http://www.spaggiari.org/media/blogs/hbase/pdf/performances_20130404.pdf I have just restarted scanRange100 to validate the numbers. JM 2013/4/3 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>: > I think that sounds good. > > On Wednesday, April 3, 2013, Stack wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Purtell >> <[email protected]<javascript:;>> >> wrote: >> >> > Then what if we do not provide native binary convenience artifacts and >> > instead print an INFO level log message, should they be missing, which >> > points to a book chapter on compiling and installing them? >> > >> > >> Yes. For now, I could just fill out the section in refguide on mlockall >> since that the only native lib we ship? >> St.Ack >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White)
