+1, tarballs look good, checksums match, started up local clusters with both the base and security builds and ran LoadTestTool, didn't see anything amiss in the logs.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 > > I tested a 0.94.6.1 master with a 0.94.2 region server and now it works :) > > J-D > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think we're good. Any objection if I released this as 0.94.6.1 and > > remove 0.94.6 once propagated? > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl < > > [email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:33 PM > > Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 please have a look > > > > Fixed subject. (Maybe you can have a "loop", but I'd be fine if you just > > had a "look".) > > > > > > +1 from me. All tests pass. I installed it, loaded some data, ran my > > in-block-cache perf test, checked the version numbers, etc. > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > To: hbase-dev <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 12:33 PM > > Subject: 0.94.6.1 please have a loop > > > > Uploaded here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6.1/ > > > > Please have a quick look and vote +1/-1 today. > > Only changes are HBASE-8259, CHANGES.txt (to include that jira), and > > pom.xml (naming the release 0.94.6.1). > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- Lars > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
