Thanks stack! On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The argument for excluding the 0.96 tag makes sense. Can we agree to do > > this: > > > > Commit only to trunk: Mark with 0.98 > > Commit to 0.95 and trunk : Mark with 0.98, and 0.95.x > > Commit to 0.94.x and 0.95, and trunk: Mark with 0.98, 0.95.x, and 0.94.x > > Commit to 89-fb: Mark with 89-fb. > > Commit site fixes: no version > > > > > I added the above agreement to the refguide: > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#decisions > > I fixed issues that were resolved w/ 0.95.0 adding 0.98.0 as per above. > > > > Should we remove 0.96 tag for now until the branch appears again? > > > > I removed it. > > Good on you lads, > St.Ack > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
