I've not tested the public release, only my own build. I also haven't tested hadoop1. I've got a test in progress, let me run it for a while and coming back to you.
My general feeling from my previous tests is that this rc is much more stable than 0.95.0 or trunk. But let's wait a little to confirm this. In any case, we will need to have maven working for the RC2 imho. If it has to be a file copy, well, let's do that. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for testing Mr. Liochon. Sounds like our mvn publishing needs a > bit of work still around hadoop2 (hadoop1 works?). You +1 on this as dev > release? > > St.Ack > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Nicolas Liochon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've tried to test the hadoop2 maven release with ycsb. > > > > If I build hbase locally, with > > mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0 > > then I can compile ycsb, providing 0.95.1 as the hbase version. > > => Compilation & execution works. > > > > If I provide 0.95.0-hadoop2-SNAPSHOT (the version found in > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/hbase, > > but there is a bunch of files with different dates there) > > > > Then it builds, but I have a failure on execution. > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.getInputStream(Ljava/net/Socket;)Ljava/io/InputStream; > > at > > > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcClient$Connection.setupIOstreams(RpcClient.java:814) > > > > When I dig with mvn dependency:tree, I see hadoop2 dependencies only, as > > expected. > > > > => Is that the version to use? If not, which one should I use, from which > > repo? > > > > > > As well, by default, we don't configure log4j, so we don't have anything > on > > screen: log4j does not output to screen by default for security reasons > (if > > the data is confidential). We should probably change this. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Nicolas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Here is our second 0.95.1 release candidate. Should we put this out as > > > 0.95.1? > > > > > > Since 0.95.1 is "just" a "Development" Series release [1], lets keep > the > > > vote period short. Please vote by this Tuesday, June 11th. > > > > > > The release artifacts may be downloaded from: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC1/< > > > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.1RC0/> > > > > > > Almost 200 issues have been closed since we put out 0.95.0 [2]. > > > > > > All feedback is welcome. We'd be interested in getting comments on > > > everything from the packaging, layout, through documentation, UI, and > of > > > course, > > > any bugs found. I deployed SNAPSHOTs to maven and would particularly > > like > > > to hear from downstream projects on whether our maven packaging is > > > palatable. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > > > > >
