(Changed the subject) On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I want to see initial data type APIs ship out with 0.95.2. A patch for > ordered byte serialization is up (HBASE-8201) and is nearing steady-state. > However, sershe is the only person who's left feedback. I just posted an > early patch for the data type API itself (HBASE-8693). It should get some > eyes from all manor of interested parties, but I'll settle for folk from > Phoenix for now. > > It would be cool if Phoenix and Kiji fellows and any one else interested would weigh in and take a look see. This does not strike me as something we should hold up the release for though. It looks like something that could go in at any time? > Should these tasks be escalated to criticals in order to grab attention? > > I don't think that works going by past experience (and I don't think this a blocker on 0.96) > Additional comments inline. > > ... > Namespaces is the long pole and progress seems slow. Do we hold up the > > release for them? How can we hurry this effort along? Swat team > descends > > on Y!? > > > > It would be a shame to not get a decision on this in for 0.96. > > Agree. We need to get 0.96 out though. It has been too long. > + Is anyone testing? Integration tests fail on ec2 build from time to time > > [2]. Our Elliott dug in on one of the failures a few days back and found > > legit issue w/ no retry on admin tasks (I heart hbase-it tests). Our > unit > > test story is better [3] but there are still the odd failures. > > > > With the creation of the new list, noticing these issues is going to push > further back-burner. Nannying this stuff should retain focus. I'll > volunteer to track on these issues as I see them. > > Thank you Nick. > Notice though that some of the more recent failures are caused by lack of > disk space on the Jenkins build host. > > Oh. Missed that. Let me dig in. St.Ack
