Ok. I get similar performances between 0.94.7 and 0.94.9 for the randomRead
0.94.7 => 1124179.9ms 0.94.9 => 1110489.3ms I will re-run the tests one by one for all the 0.94.x versions and update my charts... 2013/7/3 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>: > Ok. Test pass if I run it alone: > > mvn clean test -P runSmallTests -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true > -Dtest=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook > > ------------------------------------------------------- > T E S T S > ------------------------------------------------------- > Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 11.642 sec > > Results : > > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > > > And finally passed on another one: > Results : > > Tests run: 1359, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13 > > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 1:33:34.925s > [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jul 02 16:37:59 EDT 2013 > [INFO] Final Memory: 44M/594M > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > So it's all +1 for me. > > JM > > 2013/7/2 Elliott Clark <[email protected]>: >> +1 >> >> untared. >> Checked the sig. >> Ran Ycsb. >> Ran PE. >> upgraded from 94.8. >> >> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> passes fine here too >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 11:22 AM >>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is available >>> for download >>> >>> Yup: >>> >>> Running >>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook >>> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 22.756 sec >>> >>> Have you looked at the log to see on what error it fails? >>> >>> J-D >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> JD, does TestRegionObserverScannerOpenHook work for you? >>>> >>>> I will retry to run it again on 3 different computers to see. >>>> >>>> JM >>>> >>>> 2013/7/1 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: >>>>> Hah. I let Cody answer here. I didn't like the empty table either, but he >>>>> preferred it. >>>>> >>>>> -- Lars >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________ >>>>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:35 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] The 1st hbase 0.94.9 release candidate is >>>>> available for download >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I ran some PE single node tests on both tars, looked at the web UIs >>>>> and logs. I'm +1 on this RC. >>>>> >>>>> My only nit is the way that HBASE-5083 leaves an empty table if there >>>>> are not backup masters is kinda ugly. >>>>> >>>>> J-D >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:51 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> The 1st 0.94.9 RC is available for download at >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.9-rc0/ >>>>>> Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >>>>>> >>>>>> Like the previous point releases, 0.94.9 is a primarily a bug fix >>>>>> release. This RC is comparatively small with 26 issues resolved against >>>>>> it: >>>>>> [HBASE-8453] - TestImportExport failing again due to configuration >>>>>> issues >>>>>> [HBASE-8494] - TestRemoteAdmin#testClusterStatus should not assume >>>>>> 'requests' does not change >>>>>> [HBASE-8522] - Archived hfiles and old hlogs may be deleted >>>>>> immediately by HFileCleaner, LogCleaner in HMaster >>>>>> [HBASE-8555] - FilterList correctness may be affected by random >>>>>> ordering of sub-filter(list) >>>>>> [HBASE-8590] - [0.94] BlockingMetaScannerVisitor should check for >>>>>> parent meta entry while waiting for split daughter >>>>>> [HBASE-8639] - Poor performance of htable#getscanner in >>>>>> multithreaded environment due to DNS.getDefaultHost() being called in >>>>>> ScannerCallable#prepare() >>>>>> [HBASE-8640] - ServerName in master may not initialize with the >>>>>> configured ipc address of hbase.master.ipc.address >>>>>> [HBASE-8655] - Backport to 94 - HBASE-8346(Prefetching .META. rows >>>>>> in case only when useCache is set to true) >>>>>> [HBASE-8656] - Rpc call may not be notified in SecureClient >>>>>> [HBASE-8671] - Per-region WAL breaks CP backwards compatibility in >>>>>> 0.94 for non-enabled case >>>>>> [HBASE-8684] - Table Coprocessor can't access external HTable by >>>>>> default >>>>>> [HBASE-8700] - IntegrationTestBigLinkedList can fail due to random >>>>>> number collision >>>>>> [HBASE-8724] - [0.94] ExportSnapshot should not use hbase.tmp.dir as >>>>>> a staging dir on hdfs >>>>>> [HBASE-8742] - HTableDescriptor Properties not preserved when cloning >>>>>> [HBASE-8743] - upgrade hadoop-23 version to 0.23.7 >>>>>> [HBASE-8749] - Potential race condition between >>>>>> FSUtils.renameAndSetModifyTime() and HFile/LogCleaner >>>>>> [HBASE-8762] - Performance/operational penalty when calling >>>>>> HTable.get with a list of one Get >>>>>> [HBASE-8783] - RSSnapshotManager.ZKProcedureMemberRpcs may be >>>>>> initialized with the wrong server name >>>>>> [HBASE-5083] - Backup HMaster should have http infoport open with >>>>>> link to the active master >>>>>> [HBASE-8609] - Make the CopyTable support startRow, stopRow options >>>>>> [HBASE-8636] - Backport KeyValue Codec to 0.94 (HBASE-7413) >>>>>> [HBASE-8683] - Add major compaction support in CompactionTool >>>>>> [HBASE-8692] - [AccessController] Restrict HTableDescriptor >>>>>> enumeration >>>>>> [HBASE-8702] - Make WALEditCodec pluggable >>>>>> [HBASE-8504] - HTable.getRegionsInRange() should provide a >>>>>> non-cached API >>>>>> [HBASE-8603] - Backport HBASE-6921 to 0.94 >>>>>> >>>>>> The full list of changes is also available here: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324431 >>>>>> >>>>>> Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and >>>>>> vote +1/-1 by July 2nd on whether we should release this as 0.94.9. >>>>>> >>>>>> The release testing spreadsheet is available here: >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdGFHaktDR0FqLWdtQWZwdncyVzE3Z2c#gid=0 >>>>>> (if you test this release, please add your test to this spreadsheet, so >>>>>> that we can gauge the coverage) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Lars >>>>>> >>>>>> ps. I will likely be without access to the Internet for the next five >>>>>> days >>>
