STATUS +Build
A few of us have been working on broke junit tests. Progress is slow but steady. Currently I am looking into zombie tests -- "all" tests complete but the build still fails. Andrew Purtell has set me up w/ a clone box from his ec2 rig which is helping figure the zombie phenomenon. I also just added our hadoopqa zombie detector up on apache trunk build to see if it yields clues at nkeywals' suggestion. I also need to fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8764 so the ec2 integration test build passes (ec2 build runs integration tests which apache build does not) +Reviews Francis' namespaces is in need of review as are other 'Patch Available' criticals that we'd like committed such as Sergey's compaction changes. If any volunteers are game, see the 'patch available' issues here [1]. Contrib appreciated. +Testing I know of at least one rig that is going up to do long-term hbase-it tests. Any other testing going on that folks would like to talk up? +Migration Testing and finish documentation on moving from 0.94 pedigree to 0.96. Still TODO. +Packaging Making it so we can publish an hbase 0.96 built against hadoop1 and hadoop2. Still TODO. What else? I am still heading for end of July for a complete '0.96'. Thanks, St.Ack 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > I am shooting for end of July for 0.96 being 'complete'. I would like to > make a 0.96 release in August. We have some criticals outstanding but I > think we could ship even if these are not fixed in time (excepting > migration polish and of course remaining build fixes). See [1.] for the > current list of issues. Please re-prioritize issues as you see fit (or > better, move issues out of 0.95.2 if you do not think they will be done in > time). > > What to do with namespaces -- the last 0.96 'feature' -- given the above > timeline? Currently it is a massive patch out on a branch. It is still > not done, in want of review, and the author is going on holidays for a few > weeks soon. My thinking as of now, going by the rate of change over the > last few weeks and estimating what is yet to be done, is that namespaces > will not make it. I am willing to be convinced otherwise but that is how > it looks to me currently. > > I am going to start just disabling flakey unit tests in 0.95 from here on > out. When folks get the itch, they can fix at leisure first on trunk and > then over in 0.95. > > What else? > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > 1. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> (Changed the subject) >> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I want to see initial data type APIs ship out with 0.95.2. A patch for >>> ordered byte serialization is up (HBASE-8201) and is nearing >>> steady-state. >>> However, sershe is the only person who's left feedback. I just posted an >>> early patch for the data type API itself (HBASE-8693). It should get some >>> eyes from all manor of interested parties, but I'll settle for folk from >>> Phoenix for now. >>> >>> >> It would be cool if Phoenix and Kiji fellows and any one else interested >> would weigh in and take a look see. >> >> This does not strike me as something we should hold up the release for >> though. It looks like something that could go in at any time? >> >> >> >>> Should these tasks be escalated to criticals in order to grab attention? >>> >>> >> I don't think that works going by past experience (and I don't think this >> a blocker on 0.96) >> >> >> >>> Additional comments inline. >>> >>> >> ... >> >> >> >>> Namespaces is the long pole and progress seems slow. Do we hold up the >>> > release for them? How can we hurry this effort along? Swat team >>> descends >>> > on Y!? >>> > >>> >>> It would be a shame to not get a decision on this in for 0.96. >>> >>> >> Agree. We need to get 0.96 out though. It has been too long. >> >> >> >>> + Is anyone testing? Integration tests fail on ec2 build from time to >>> time >>> > [2]. Our Elliott dug in on one of the failures a few days back and >>> found >>> > legit issue w/ no retry on admin tasks (I heart hbase-it tests). Our >>> unit >>> > test story is better [3] but there are still the odd failures. >>> > >>> >>> With the creation of the new list, noticing these issues is going to push >>> further back-burner. Nannying this stuff should retain focus. I'll >>> volunteer to track on these issues as I see them. >>> >>> >> Thank you Nick. >> >> >> >>> Notice though that some of the more recent failures are caused by lack of >>> disk space on the Jenkins build host. >>> >>> >> Oh. Missed that. Let me dig in. >> >> >> St.Ack >> > >
