On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> That should mean that it's possible to make this change in a later version > without holding up 0.96. > Will this hold up 0.96? What would you suggest we do, besides making a patch available for review along with test results, which is in the works. As you say this work can co-exist perfectly well with all code in 0.96 without interference with it. (Although it is reasonable to be skeptical of my claims until viewing a patch.) -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
