JIRA says that was created August 3, ie today, is that right?
On Saturday, August 3, 2013, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote: > Is it HBASE-9121 ? > > 2013/8/3 Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > Is there a patch available for the tracing work mentioned? I don't think > > I've seen anything about it. > > > > > > On Saturday, August 3, 2013, Stack wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Stack > > > <st...@duboce.net<javascript:;><javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The end of July is upon us. I intend to cut a 0.95.2 next weekend > and > > > > 0.95.2 will be 0.96.0 but for bug fixes and migration polish. No > more > > > > 'features' will be allowed after next weekend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done some moving around of hbase 0.95.2 issues [1] to reflect > > what > > > > the priorities are for this week (to my mind). It is all about > polish, > > > bad > > > > bugs, unit test failures, and packaging/publishing/build issues. > > > > > > > > I'll be working on the blockers this week [2]. A few are in need of > > > > reviews; e.g. "HBASE-3787 Increment is non-idempotent but client > > retries > > > > RPC". Feel free to take over any blockers if you'd like to help out: > > > e.g. > > > > "HBASE-7386 Investigate providing some supervisor support for znode > > > > deletion" > > > > > > > > Criticals [3] are mostly just unit test issues that are probably > fixed > > by > > > > now and another few that are patches in need of test/review: e.g. > > > > "HBASE-8874 PutCombiner is skipping KeyValues while combining puts of > > > same > > > > row during bulkload" and "HBASE-8778 Region assigments scan table > > > directory > > > > making them slow for huge tables". > > > > "HBASE-6127 TestAtomicOperation#testMultiRowMutationMultiThreads > > > > occasionally fails" is a bad one in need of attention. Again, if up > > for > > > > helping out, be our guest. > > > > > > > > There are some great patches hanging out in the priority major issues > > > > section that are patch available that could be committed but for want > > of > > > > review: e.g. "HBASE-8369 MapReduce over snapshot files". > > > > > > > > Regards the big features that are racing to make the 0.96 cutoff -- > > > namely > > > > namespaces, tags, and serialization lib -- as I see it, Francis needs > > > > reviews if namespaces are to make it, tags ditto, and the > serialization > > > > libs are nice-to-have auxillaries that can come in at any time. If > not > > > > done by the end of this week, then as I see it, these features do not > > > make > > > > the cut. > > > > > > > > Unit tests are mostly passing. The problematics are being worked on > > > (e.g. > > > > JD is on the replication set -- it likely a real problem rather than > a > > > > flakey test). > > > > > > > > How's the above sound? > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > P.S. It is late but if folks want to meet this week to hack in > patches > > > > together, just say. I could organize an afternoon or day if you all > > > think > > > > it would be a good idea. > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12320040#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel > > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC > > > > 3. > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.95.2%22%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Critical%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UPDATE: > > > > > > I was to cut 0 -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
