>Could the codec itself figure its context and act appropriately? +1 for this.
-Anoop- On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:04 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Currently in the RPC client we can configure the codec but the same codec > > would apply to the client and the server. > > > > If we could configure a different codec for the server to client > > communication it could help us in some cases. > > > > For example, if we need to remove the tags from sending it to the client > > then having a new KV Codec on the server side would help to remove the > tags > > before sending it to the client for security usecases. > > > > So when we move to Cells later this type of selecting codecs would would > > really be useful. > > > > Am i missing something here? Thoughts on this? > > > > Makes sense. > > We don't have vocabulary for doing this currently. > > Could the codec itself figure its context and act appropriately? > > St.Ack >
