Ooops.

On Aug 14, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:

> bq. JOIN is not supported in Phoenix
> 
> That is correct.
> 
> See https://github.com/forcedotcom/Phoenix/wiki
> 
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Vladimir Rodionov
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> Michael, JOIN is not supported in Phoenix for very obvious reasons and will
>> probably never be (may be except of JOIN against replicated tables) .
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Michael Segel <
>> [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This isn't too bad if you're doing a simple query against one index.
>> You
>>>> can do the work by RS and then join the results from all RS.
>>>> 
>>>> However… what happens if you have two indexes and your result set is
>>> going
>>>> to be the intersection of the indexes?
>>>> 
>>>> Or you're going to do a join between two tables using the indexes to
>>> limit
>>>> the result set?
>>>> 
>>>> Now your design breaks down quickly.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> You may have just described their design assumptions.
>>> 
>>> I'm not endorsing this per se, but suggesting it is not a good idea on
>>> account it can't live up to the requirements of a pretty particular
>>> strawman seems a step too far.
>>> 
>>> Maybe someone from Huawei can talk a bit here about successful use cases?
>>> 
>>>> You could also look at Lucene which we did a PoC a few years back.
>>> 
>>> A certain large technology company has an HBase full text index built on
>>> Lucene that might be offered as a contribution at some point. From what I
>>> know of it, there are a different set of tradeoffs and it certainly won't
>>> work for everyone, and not because the people working on it were not
>> smart
>>> enough to find a silver bullet.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>>   - Andy
>>> 
>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>>> (via Tom White)
>>> 
>> 

The opinions expressed here are mine, while they may reflect a cognitive 
thought, that is purely accidental. 
Use at your own risk. 
Michael Segel
michael_segel (AT) hotmail.com





Reply via email to